CE 573 Transportation Planning - Fall 2001

Administration Course materials Other links
week 1 week 2 week 3 week 4
week 5 week 6 week 7 week 8
week 9 week 10 week 11 week 12
week 13 week 14 week 15

Class Notes - Class 12 (Wednesday, October 3, 2001)

Today's class will provide a review for examination #1.

Click here for lecture notes.

Exam format:

  • The examination will be closed book.  
  • You will have the entire class period to complete the exam.
  • You should bring blank paper, pencils and an eraser, and a calculator.  
  • An equation sheet will be provided with the examination.  However, none of the variables will be defined and there will be more equations than you will need.  In other words, you need to be able to recognize the correct equation to use for a particular problem.
  • The exam will not just be using equations, however.  You should make sure that you understand the material that we have covered in sufficient depth so that you can discuss concepts clearly and that you can show that you can analyze new situations using the tools that you have learned during the first five weeks of the semester.

General topic areas to review

  • During the first week, we discussed policies issues related to transportation planning.
  • During the second and third weeks, we discussed the Highway Capacity Manual and how it is used to determine quality of service for pedestrian facilities.
  • During the fourth week, we conducted an origin-destination study and learned how this technique can be used to study travel patterns in a corridor.
  • During the fifth week, we studied the planning method of the Highway Capacity Manual for signalized intersections.

Most important note:  As you prepare for the exam, go beyond the equations:  what are the key points that you can learn about each topic.  What is important about each technical method?  How is it used or applied? 

Policy and planning questions to consider from week 1.  

  1. In the chapter by Meyer and Gomez-Ibanez, (Autos, Transit, and Cities, Chapter 1, The evolution of public concerns and policies), they make the following assertion:  "solving problems created by the automobile will require modifications in both the use and design of the automobile itself.  Nothing less will suffice.  Other policies, such as improving alternative types of transit, can help, but cannot do the job alone".  Based on your reading of this chapter, what is the basis for this statement?
  2. Meyer and Gomez-Ibanez also state that:  "Public policy in urban transportation has all too often been based on on highly oversimplified diagnosis, without any recognition of the interactions among various urban transportation policies and other public policy goals.  Specifically, public policy has tended to shift from one simple panacea to another. ... Unfortunately, the need all along has not been for large-scale attempts to solve the urban transportation problem at one swoop but rather for a sustained, systematic, simultaneous effort on many fronts.  This effort, moreover, must include an undertaking to make the automobile a more acceptable and civilized part of the urban scene; problems created by the dominance of the automobile in urban transportation cannot be solved by seeking a solution through indirect expedients."  What past policies, according to Meyer and Gomez-Ibanez, have been attempted and have not succeeded?
  3. Altshuler describes the problems of urban transportation as highway congestion, the decline of mass transit, the disruptive effects of highway construction, and the high rate of highway accidents.  How would you propose to measure whether these are actual problems or only perceptions?
  4. Taebel and Cornehls describe seven ideological categories that can be used to classify approaches that have been taken to analyze or assess the urban transportation problem.  These categories include the auto monopolists, the auto apologists, the social engineers, the trustbusters, the transit technicians, the balancers, and the ecologists.  Why do you suppose that it is important for transportation planners to understand these categories as they address transportation problems?
  5. Meyer and Miller describe the classic approach to transportation planning as one that produces a plan.  The  product of the planning process "can be any form of communication with decision-makers that provides useful information in identifying alternative actions and selecting among them."  What do they mean by this assertion?
  6. Meyer and Miller list eight trends that provide a context for urban transportation.  These trends were identified in the early 1980s and include: fiscal austerity as a theme of governmental policy, increased awareness of an uncertain future, a changing perspective on the role of the automobile, changing household characteristics, a broadening of the roles for transportation, moving away from technological solutions, continuing suburbanization of urban areas, and increasing attention to system rehabilitation and maintenance.  Carefully consider each trend.  Based on your view of today's conditions (in the U.S. or in your home country), would you eliminate any of these trends as not characterizing today's conditions?  Or, would you add any trends that have occurred in the past twenty years that should be added to this list?
  7. Meyer and Miller define transportation planning as (1) understanding the types of decisions that need to be made, (2) assessing opportunities and limitations of the future, (3) identifying the short- and long-term consequences of alternative choices designed to take advantage of these opportunities or respond to these limitations, (4) relating alternative decisions to the goals and objectives established for an urban area, agency, or firm, and (5) presenting this information to decision makers in a readily understandable and useful form.  Consider these five elements that they propose, list some of the factors that need to be included in a transportation planning process designed to determine how to solve the congestion that exists at a signalized intersection.
  8. Meyer and Miller propose four steps that constitute the urban transportation planning process: diagnosis and data management, analysis and evaluation, scheduling and budgeting, and monitoring.  Considering the example described above (congestion at a signalized intersection), what activities do you think should be conducted as part of a transportation planning process?
  9. Meyer and Miller assert that the urban transportation system can be characterized by three major components:  (1) the spatial configuration of the transportation system, (2) the technology of urban transportation, and (3) the institutional foundation of the urban transportation system.  Briefly describe each component and why it is significant.

Multimodal level of service issues to consider from weeks 2 and 3.

  • What are the differences between the HCM procedure and the Florida DOT procedure for determine the level of service at a pedestrian facility?  When (for what conditions) should each procedure be applied?
  • What are the components of the Florida DOT procedure to analyze the level of service at pedestrian facilities?  How important is each component in determining level of service?

License plate survey from week 4.

  • Why is it important to understand travel patterns along a corridor or a street?
  • What are the elements of a license plate survey?
  • What factors must be considered in the field data collection?
  • What factors must be considered in the analysis of the field data?

Signalized intersection planning analysis method from week 5.

  • What are the input requirements for this method?
  • What left turn (LT) treatments are possible in this model?
  • What is the critical sum?
  • What is lost time?
  • What is the critical v/c ratio?
  • How is the critical v/c ratio determined?