CE 572 - Intersection Traffic Operations
Spring 2007


 
  Home
Administration
Course Materials
Resources
Class 07 - 8 February 2007

Website of the day:
Utah Traffic Lab

Objectives for today:

  • Understand relationship between maximum desirable headway and unoccupancy time

Topics:

  • Review and discuss Assignment 4
  • Discuss relationship between headway and unoccupancy time
  • Assignment 5

Class notes:
Written notes

Slides

Assignment 5
1. Use the attached spreadsheet to investigate the following questions. 

  • Question 1. Based on your saturation headway data (from all five intervals) from Assignment 4, compute the equivalent values for unoccupancy time.  Assume a detection zone length of 22 feet, average vehicle length of 20 feet, and average vehicle speed of 35 mi/hr.  The distribution should be at 0.25 sec intervals and you should include in your chart side by side comparisons of the distribution for the headway data and the unoccupancy time data.  What is the horizontal shift that you observe between these two distributions? [Hint: check the difference in the means between your two data sets].
  • Question 2. Using this same spreadsheet tool, prepare an XY chart of unoccupancy time vs detection zone length for a passenger car (Lv=20') and bus (Lv=40'), for a range of detection zone lengths from 0 to 100 feet.  Assume h = 1.9 seconds and v = 35 mi/hr.  What conclusions can you draw from this plot regarding how vehicle length and detection zone length affect unoccupancy time?  And, what is the significance of this finding for signal timing.
  • The results of your work (in an Excel spreadsheet) should be emailed to me by noon on Tuesday, February 13th.  Be ready to discuss the results of your work in class at that time.

2. Read the following paper: "A Foundation for Jointly Determining Passage Time and Detection Zone Length Using Stop Bar Presence Detection". Be ready to discuss following questions in preparation for class next Tuesday:

  • Question 1. What is the major purpose of the paper?
  • Question 2. According to the paper, when is the appropriate time to terminate the green interval?
  • Question 3. Why do we need to consider field or simulation data when looking at the true effects of headway distributions and/or unoccupancy time distributions?
  • Question 4. Briefly summarize the results of the case study described in section 4 of the paper.  What is the justification for the selection of the recommended passage time?

Questions on today's class:
1. Can someone really just change the passage time for an approach as a result of a phone call?
Response: It does happen!  The "phone call" indicator is something that traffic engineers really talk about at meetings!  More often than not, the problem is with a side street that deals with a long maximum green on the major street.

2. Detectors, I assume, are very costly. Why not just always install small detectors and have larger passage times?
Response: Good question.  There is a tradeoff in the cost vs. the performance that the longer detection zone provides.  Having the detector "take the place" of the longer passage time is something that is being considered these days.  But in addition to the cost trade-off, there is also the reliability problem.  Longer loops tend to have more problems than shorter loops.  But the point here is that we have to consider the timing parameter decision at the same time that we are considering the detection zone design.

3. Just to clarify, the headways used for Assignment #3 (questions 5 on) were headways of the vehicles as they pass a single point, not an average headway for the time a particular vehicle is in the system.
Response: Correct.  They are the individual headway measurements, not an average.

4. I understand that the unoccupancy time is one of the parameters used to set up the passage time. Which value of unoccupancy time should be used as reference, the larger one?
Response: What we are saying is that you should start with the maximum headway that you are willing to tolerate before you make the phase termination decision.  Once you've established this value, you can then relate this headway to an unoccupancy time, based on an average vehicle speed and length.  I'm not sure what you mean by the "larger one".

5. I got 3.8 sec for the saturation headway, which I think is too high. Should I consider not using the 4th and 5th vehicle in computing the saturation headway as those are the ones that are increasing the saturation headway.
Response: The Highway Capacity Manual suggests that the headways beginning with the 4th vehicle be used in computing the saturation headway.  So, I don't suggest eliminating this measurement.  However, it does seem high.  Have you checked your other values?  See me if your estimate remains at this level.

6. What is the significance of detector lengths in multiples of 22' feet? Does it have something to do with the average car length of 20 feet?
Response: No.  It has to do with the standard loop length of 6 feet by 6 feet.  Many agencies use two loops at the stop bar spaced 9 feet apart.  So, 6 + 9 + 6 is 21 feet.  I've used 22 feet in many of my examples so this is close to the standard used in practice.  I'll get my notes updated at some point!
 

 
        i