University of Idaho Sustainable Transportation

                 

Class 03 - 13 February 2006 - Where Do We Go From Here?

Assignment: What two questions should we answer this semester?

Philip Cook
As I understand the assignment it is to focus on two questions we can realistically address this semester in the seminar, and suggest "data sources."
[1] "What is the relationship between a ring road and economic development?" This question really combines two of my questions from last week (development along the ring road and effects on downtown businesses). Data sources: I've already begun to collect case studies, as part of my Transportation Commission interest. I have several megabytes worth. Most deal with "bypasses." I think we'll have to extrapolate to our "ring road" situation. Also, I remember during the conference last fall, Ray Dezanni brought up Boston as an example. I have not been able to find a case study for it. (Issues of scale will be of particular interest.) I'm sure there's more literature to be mined.
[2] "What institutional (legal) mechanisms do we have available in Idaho to protect a corridor for future transportation (and perhaps other) purposes?" I think answering this question is critical for moving any concept of a future transportation corridor forward to reality. And it's very practical from our county planners'/commissioners' perspectives. Data sources: Perhaps inviting a legal expert on Idaho local land use planning to speak with us. (I have no idea if the law school has such a person.) Also, I think ITD has protected corridors in other parts of the state; perhaps an expert from ITD can provide us with helpful information.

Isaak Strout
Two questions I think we should work toward answering:
1) My personal (and possibly misguided) belief is that urban and suburban growth is both stimulated and directed by the provision public infrastructure—roads, sewer, etc. If this build-it-and-they-will-come relationship does indeed exist, and if a key to urban sustainability is encouraging population density, than is it beneficial to be discussing infrastructure development well beyond the city’s periphery? While I understand the goal is to establish a viable right-of-way before it is developed, the question remains, does simply proposing such far in the future transportation routes stimulate and encourage patterns of low-density, private auto dependent, sprawling suburban development? What is the evidence from other areas that have wrestled with this planning dilemma? (Sorry, many questions)
2) A second question that I think is worthy of our focus is determining how to address the land surrounding any proposed ring-road from a regulatory standpoint. Most seem to agree that a ring-road will be a limited access, multi-use roadway not intended to encourage commercial strip and sprawling residential development. What specific regulatory, legal or ownership tactics will have to be employed to reach this end? I’m thinking that the present city zoning structures will be inadequate in handling this. Again, what successes and failures have other communities experienced?

Lei Wu
Two questions to answer for Sustainable Transportation
1. What kind of ring road is context sensitive for Moscow?
2. How can it fit in a context sensitive transportation infrastructure for Moscow?
My data source would be case studies and data from local governments.

Hua Wang
(1) How to achieve the best interaction between a ring road/MGP and the development of Moscow? As we known, there are bad examples of roadway development which damaged the core of city. We need to learn the factors of Moscow and its surrounding that will assure the success of the ring road/MGP. We will also look at the countermeasures to mitigate negative impacts of the ring road/MGP.
(2) What processes and methods do we need to have for working on a long term transportation project in an interdisciplinary framework? The concepts of ring road /MGP are for the future of Moscow. Both of them require a long term interaction between interdisciplinary groups/persons. The processes and methods that will allow better communication within interdisciplinary team and local agencies should be identified. it will help maintain the sustainability of Moscow. How can we share the information from different disciplines should also be included in this question.

Barb Andersen
(1) Can we use the ring road concept as a way to promote ecological restoration on the Palouse? How?
(2) What kinds of sustainable practices can we propose that will mitigate the impacts of a ring road?

Nick Sanyal
Two things that we can, and should, get done this semester are:
1. To identify the community values/characteristics that a ring road will help enhance. This will enable us to best market, locate, design and use the ring road to further the quality if life in Moscow. Simply to build a road for the sake of a road is neither a sustainable accomplishment nor is it in the interest of the citizenry.
2. Second, we must continue to discuss the design, location and nature of the ring road. This MUST include realistic investigation into mechanisms that will help preserve the corridor until we can build the road, and also protect the corridor from encroachment from “unwanted” development. After all, the road is being developed to enhance community values.

I feel the composition of our group makes these discussions very realistic—we have the expertise and the curiosity. We can also benefit from the cross pollination that interdisciplinary work fosters.

Dante Perez-Bravo
Identified two points that we need to work for this semester, explain? - Is the ring road a sustainable project, and how sustainable is it? I started to think about sustainability in terms of quantification. I believe that a project is sustainable, when it reaches equilibrium between economic, environmental and social issues. As it was said during the last meeting, the need of transportation infrastructure is going to be always an important part of our society. It means that given the necessity of having a ring road, it will be build and always there is going to be opinions against the project. That is why, during this semester we should focused on the most important aspects that this project must satisfy, fulfilling the three issues aforementioned.

Bill McLaughlin
Several conceptual models (e.g., ring road) of the Moscow Area’s Future Traffic Flow Pattern with a detailed reporting of likely impacts and trade-offs Graphic plus written text

Several alternative processes developed by small groups to engage the stakeholders in an open and learning oriented discussion of this topic to discuss alternative models. These would include the actual activities you would propose to get others to think through this issue.

Conceptual Models of the Moscow Area’s Future Traffic Flow Pattern based on thinking through different mixes of modalities (e.g., bikes, cars, walking, train connection to Pullman etc.)

Michael Kyte
I'm including a set of performance indicators that I'm preparing for a presentation that I will be giving to Wendy McClure's class this week on sustainable transportation.  Also, here is the web link for notes that I'm using for the class:
http://www.webs1.uidaho.edu/mkyte/education/arch504/arch504-01.htm

  • Percent of auto trips that could be made by other modes (walk, bike, transit)
  • Pedestrian facilities (sidewalks) at major destinations (residential, commercial)
  • Access to developments Internal circulation at site/within site
  • Percent alternatively fueled local vehicles (private, public)
  • Modal split for all travel, and by major travel markets/segments
  • How land use changes affect existing travel patterns (and ability to use non-auto mode) Does existing land-use support shorter trips
  • Services available to low income and disabled travelers
  • Cost to construct and maintain transport system Life cycle costs Constraints on funding sources
  •  Incidence of transport injuries and fatalities Miles of sidewalks

J.D. Wulfhorst
Questions I'd like to focus on w/in the seminar:
1) What criteria could this diverse group (even if we are not fully representative of all groups) establish to create plans for a Moscow ring road that would allow for ongoing evaluation and adaptation at 5 yrs, 20 yrs, and 50 yrs scales?
2) Can we determine a process to build a local coalition of support & institutional partnerships for this project?

Notes from Mike Dixon from class discussion
Values:
1) Socially equitable
2) Economic stability
3) Time and energy efficient
4) Environmentally sensitive
5) Small, friendly community environment or feeling
6) Active and healthy community
7) Attractive clean industry What annexation possibilities are there for the ring road?

I think that at some time we need to address this question (in the context of the ring road of course): What two questions do you have that, if answered, would help you consider all of the listed values in transportation improvements?

Top priority discussion for next week: We need to set a roadmap for the rest of the semester.